SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 8: Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review.

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10143/95162
Title:
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 8: Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review.
Authors:
Lewin, Simon; Oxman, Andrew David; Lavis, John N; Fretheim, Atle
Citation:
Health research policy and systems 2009, 7 Suppl 1:S8
Additional Links:
http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/7/S1/S8/?mkt=

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorLewin, Simonen
dc.contributor.authorOxman, Andrew Daviden
dc.contributor.authorLavis, John Nen
dc.contributor.authorFretheim, Atleen
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-29T14:21:45Z-
dc.date.available2010-03-29T14:21:45Z-
dc.date.issued2009-12-16-
dc.identifier.citationHealth research policy and systems 2009, 7 Suppl 1:S8en
dc.identifier.issn1478-4505-
dc.identifier.pmid20018115-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S8-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10143/95162-
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT : This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers.The reliability of systematic reviews of the effects of health interventions is variable. Consequently, policymakers and others need to assess how much confidence can be placed in such evidence. The use of systematic and transparent processes to determine such decisions can help to prevent the introduction of errors and bias in these judgements. In this article, we suggest five questions that can be considered when deciding how much confidence to place in the findings of a systematic review of the effects of an intervention. These are: 1. Did the review explicitly address an appropriate policy or management question? 2. Were appropriate criteria used when considering studies for the review? 3. Was the search for relevant studies detailed and reasonably comprehensive? 4. Were assessments of the studies' relevance to the review topic and of their risk of bias reproducible? 5. Were the results similar from study to study?en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/7/S1/S8/?mkt=en
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Helsetjeneste- og helseadministrasjonsforskning: 806en
dc.subject.meshDecision Makingen
dc.subject.meshHealth Policyen
dc.subject.meshReview Literature as Topicen
dc.subject.meshEvidence Based Medicineen
dc.titleSUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 8: Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review.en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.departmentNorwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, P,O, Box 7004, St, Olavs plass, N-0130 Oslo, Norway; Health Systems Research Unit, Medical Research Council of South Africa. simon.lewin@nokc.no.en
dc.identifier.journalHealth research policy and systems / BioMed Centralen
All Items in HeRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.