Pre-hospital advanced airway management by anaesthesiologists: Is there still room for improvement?

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10143/77194
Title:
Pre-hospital advanced airway management by anaesthesiologists: Is there still room for improvement?
Authors:
Sollid, Stephen JM; Heltne, Jon Kenneth; Søreide, Eldar; Lossius, Hans Morten
Citation:
Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine 2008, 16 (1):2
Additional Links:
http://www.sjtrem.com/content/16/1/2

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorSollid, Stephen JM-
dc.contributor.authorHeltne, Jon Kenneth-
dc.contributor.authorSøreide, Eldar-
dc.contributor.authorLossius, Hans Morten-
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-13T09:31:40Z-
dc.date.available2009-08-13T09:31:40Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine 2008, 16 (1):2en
dc.identifier.issn1757-7241-
dc.identifier.pmid18957064-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1757-7241-16-2-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10143/77194-
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation is an important part of pre-hospital advanced life support that requires training and experience, and should only be performed by specially trained personnel. In Norway, anaesthesiologists serve as Helicopter Emergency Medical Service HEMS physicians. However, little is known about how they themselves evaluate the quality and safety of pre-hospital advanced airway management. METHOD: Using a semi-structured questionnaire, we interviewed anaesthesiologists working in the three HEMS programs covering Western Norway. We compared answers from specialists and non-specialists as well as full- and part-time HEMS physicians. RESULTS: Of the 17 available respondents, most (88%) felt that their continuous exposure to intubations was not sufficient. Additional training was mainly acquired through other clinical practice and mannequin- or cadaver-based skills training. Of the respondents, 77% and 35% reported having experienced difficult and failed intubations, respectively. Further, 59% reported knowledge of airway management-related deaths in their HEMS program. Significantly more full- than part-time HEMS physicians had experienced these problems. All respondents had airway back-up equipment in their service, but 29% were not familiar with all the equipment. CONCLUSION: The majority of anaesthesiologists working as HEMS physicians view pre-hospital advanced airway management as a high-risk procedure. Relevant airway management competencies for HEMS physicians in Norway seem to be insufficiently trained and maintained. A better-defined level of competence with better training methods and systems seems warranted.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.sjtrem.com/content/16/1/2en
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Anestesiologi: 765en
dc.subject.meshIntubation, Endotrachealen
dc.subject.meshIntensive Care Unitsen
dc.titlePre-hospital advanced airway management by anaesthesiologists: Is there still room for improvement?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typepeer revieweden
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Division of Acute Care Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway. gasman@gmail.com.en
dc.identifier.journalScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicineen
All Items in HeRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.