Evidence-informed health policy 4 - Case descriptions of organizations that support the use of research evidence.

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10143/54893
Title:
Evidence-informed health policy 4 - Case descriptions of organizations that support the use of research evidence.
Authors:
Lavis, John N; Moynihan, Ray; Oxman, Andrew David; Paulsen, Elizabeth J
Citation:
Implementation science 2008, 3:56
Additional Links:
http://www.implementationscience.com/content/3/1/56

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorLavis, John N-
dc.contributor.authorMoynihan, Ray-
dc.contributor.authorOxman, Andrew David-
dc.contributor.authorPaulsen, Elizabeth J-
dc.date.accessioned2009-03-12T13:40:20Z-
dc.date.available2009-03-12T13:40:20Z-
dc.date.issued2008-12-17-
dc.identifier.citationImplementation science 2008, 3:56en
dc.identifier.issn1748-5908-
dc.identifier.pmid19091110-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1748-5908-3-56-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10143/54893-
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Previous efforts to produce case descriptions have typically not focused on the organizations that produce research evidence and support its use. External evaluations of such organizations have typically not been analyzed as a group to identify the lessons that have emerged across multiple evaluations. Case descriptions offer the potential for capturing the views and experiences of many individuals who are familiar with an organization, including staff, advocates, and critics. METHODS: We purposively sampled a subgroup of organizations from among those that participated in the second (interview) phase of the study and (once) from among other organizations with which we were familiar. We developed and pilot-tested a case description data collection protocol, and conducted site visits that included both interviews and documentary analyses. Themes were identified from among responses to semi-structured questions using a constant comparative method of analysis. We produced both a brief (one to two pages) written description and a video documentary for each case. RESULTS: We conducted 51 interviews as part of the eight site visits. Two organizational strengths were repeatedly cited by individuals participating in the site visits: use of an evidence-based approach (which was identified as being very time-consuming) and existence of a strong relationship between researchers and policymakers (which can be challenged by conflicts of interest). Two organizational weaknesses - a lack of resources and the presence of conflicts of interest - were repeatedly cited by individuals participating in the site visits. Participants offered two main suggestions for the World Health Organization (and other international organizations and networks): 1) mobilize one or more of government support, financial resources, and the participation of both policymakers and researchers; and 2) create knowledge-related global public goods. CONCLUSION: The findings from our case descriptions, the first of their kind, intersect in interesting ways with the messages arising from two systematic reviews of the factors that increase the prospects for research use in policymaking. Strong relationships between researchers and policymakers bodes well given such interactions appear to increase the prospects for research use. The time-consuming nature of an evidence-based approach, on the other hand, suggests the need for more efficient production processes that are 'quick and clean enough.' Our case descriptions and accompanying video documentaries provide a rich description of organizations supporting the use of research evidence, which can be drawn upon by those establishing or leading similar organizations, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.implementationscience.com/content/3/1/56en
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Helsetjeneste- og helseadministrasjonsforskning: 806en
dc.subject.meshHealth Services Researchen
dc.subject.meshHealth Policyen
dc.subject.meshEvidence-Based Medicineen
dc.titleEvidence-informed health policy 4 - Case descriptions of organizations that support the use of research evidence.en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typepeer revieweden
dc.contributor.departmentCentre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1200 Main St West, HSC-2D3, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada. lavisj@mcmaster.ca.en
dc.identifier.journalImplementation science : ISen
All Items in HeRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.