Helsebiblioteket's Research Archive (HeRA) > Other health and research institutions > Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services > Articles >
What do we know about how to do audit and feedback? Pitfalls in applying evidence from a systematic review.
- Hdl Handle:
- What do we know about how to do audit and feedback? Pitfalls in applying evidence from a systematic review.
- BMC health services research 2005, 5:50
- Additional Links:
Full metadata record
|dc.contributor.author||Eccles, M P||-|
|dc.contributor.author||Grimshaw, J M||-|
|dc.identifier.citation||BMC health services research 2005, 5:50||en|
|dc.description.abstract||BACKGROUND: Improving the quality of health care requires a range of evidence-based activities. Audit and feedback is commonly used as a quality improvement tool in the UK National Health Service [NHS]. We set out to assess whether current guidance and systematic review evidence can sufficiently inform practical decisions about how to use audit and feedback to improve quality of care. METHODS: We selected an important chronic disease encountered in primary care: diabetes mellitus. We identified recommendations from National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance on conducting audit and generated questions which would be relevant to any attempt to operationalise audit and feedback in a healthcare service setting. We explored the extent to which a systematic review of audit and feedback could provide practical guidance about whether audit and feedback should be used to improve quality of diabetes care and, if so, how audit and feedback could be optimised. RESULTS: National guidance suggests the importance of securing the right organisational conditions and processes. Review evidence suggests that audit and feedback can be effective in changing healthcare professional practice. However, the available evidence says relatively little about the detail of how to use audit and feedback most efficiently. CONCLUSION: Audit and feedback will continue to be an unreliable approach to quality improvement until we learn how and when it works best. Conceptualising audit and feedback within a theoretical framework offers a way forward.||en|
|dc.subject||VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Helsetjeneste- og helseadministrasjonsforskning: 806||en|
|dc.subject||VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Samfunnsmedisin, sosialmedisin: 801||en|
|dc.subject.mesh||Patient Education as Topic||en|
|dc.subject.mesh||Practice Guidelines as Topic||en|
|dc.subject.mesh||Primary Health Care||en|
|dc.subject.mesh||Quality Assurance, Health Care||en|
|dc.title||What do we know about how to do audit and feedback? Pitfalls in applying evidence from a systematic review.||en|
|dc.contributor.department||Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. email@example.com||en|
|dc.identifier.journal||BMC health services research||en|
All Items in HeRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.