Guidelines for rating Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF).

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10143/122165
Title:
Guidelines for rating Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF).
Authors:
Aas, Inge Harald Monrad
Citation:
Annals of general psychiatry 2011, 10:2
Additional Links:
http://www.annals-general-psychiatry.com/content/10/1/2

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorAas, Inge Harald Monraden
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-17T11:24:06Z-
dc.date.available2011-02-17T11:24:06Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of general psychiatry 2011, 10:2en
dc.identifier.issn1744-859X-
dc.identifier.pmid21251305-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1744-859X-10-2-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10143/122165-
dc.description.abstractAbstract:en
dc.description.abstractGlobal Assessment of Functioning (GAF) is a scoring system for the severity of illness in psychiatry. It is used clinically in many countries, as well as in research, but studies have shown several problems with GAF, for example concerning its validity and reliability. Guidelines for rating are important. The present study aimed to identify the current status of guidelines for rating GAF, and relevant factors and gaps in knowledge for the development of improved guidelines.en
dc.description.abstractA thorough literature search was conducted.en
dc.description.abstractFew studies of existing guidelines have been conducted; existing guidelines are short; and rating has a subjective element. Seven main categories were identified as being important in relation to further development of guidelines: (1) general points about guidelines for rating GAF; (2) introduction to guidelines, with ground rules; (3) starting scoring at the top, middle or bottom level of the scale; (4) scoring for different time periods and of different values (highest, lowest or average); (5) the finer grading of the scale; (6) different guidelines for different conditions; and (7) different languages and cultures. Little information is available about how rules for rating are understood by different raters: the final score may be affected by whether the rater starts at the top, middle or bottom of the scale; there is little data on which value/combination of GAF values to record; guidelines for scoring within 10-point intervals are limited; there is little empirical information concerning the suitability of existing guidelines for different conditions and patient characteristics; and little is known about the effects of translation into different languages or of different cultural understanding.en
dc.description.abstractFew studies have dealt specifically with guidelines for rating GAF. Current guidelines for rating GAF are not comprehensive, and relevant points for new guidelines are presented. Theoretical and empirical studies, and international expert panels would be valuable, as well as production of a manual with more information about scoring. Computerised assessment may well be the future.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.annals-general-psychiatry.com/content/10/1/2en
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Psykiatri, barnepsykiatri: 757en
dc.subject.meshPsychiatric Status Rating Scalesen
dc.subject.meshMental Disordersen
dc.titleGuidelines for rating Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF).en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typepeer revieweden
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Research, Vestfold Mental Health Care Trust, Tönsberg, Norway. monrad.aas@piv.no.en
dc.identifier.journalAnnals of general psychiatryen
All Items in HeRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.